sought to restrain the TV station from continuing the broadcast of the documentary, which it started airing on March 1, 2015 and had been repeating same daily, pending the hearing and determination of the motion on notice dated March 5, 2015. Chief Olanipekun sought to move the interlocutory application when hearing commenced on the application he filed on behalf of his client, Asiwaju Tinubu. But counsel to AIT, Chief Mike Ozekhome (SAN) objected to the moving of the application and pleaded for more time to respond to same. He told the court that his earlier reply was to the suit initially filed by one Dr. Tunji Abayomi on behalf of Asiwaju Tinubu. Chief Olanipekun then made an oral application in which he prayed the court to grant an interim order restraining AIT from further airing the contentious documentary.
Monday
COURT STOPS AIT FROM BROADCASTING DOCUMENTARY ON TINUBU
sought to restrain the TV station from continuing the broadcast of the documentary, which it started airing on March 1, 2015 and had been repeating same daily, pending the hearing and determination of the motion on notice dated March 5, 2015. Chief Olanipekun sought to move the interlocutory application when hearing commenced on the application he filed on behalf of his client, Asiwaju Tinubu. But counsel to AIT, Chief Mike Ozekhome (SAN) objected to the moving of the application and pleaded for more time to respond to same. He told the court that his earlier reply was to the suit initially filed by one Dr. Tunji Abayomi on behalf of Asiwaju Tinubu. Chief Olanipekun then made an oral application in which he prayed the court to grant an interim order restraining AIT from further airing the contentious documentary.
Translate
Related Post
loading..